>>> THANK YOU.
GOOD MORNING COLLEAGUES.
THE OCTOBER 25th, 2021 MEETING
OF THE LAND-USE AND
NEIGHBORHOODS COMMITTEE WILL
COME TO ORDER.
I AM DAN STRAUSS.
WILL THE CLERK CALLED THE
ROLE?
>> COUNCILMEMBER PEDERSEN,
COUNCILMEMBER LEWIS,
COUNCILMEMBER MORALES, CHAIR
STRAUSS.
>> THREE PRESENT.
>> TO BUY.
THE CITY OF SEATTLE BEGINS WITH
LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT.
THIS IS NOT MEANT AS AN
EXTERNAL PROCEDURE FOR THE
VIEWING PUBLIC.
IT IS A MOMENT FOR US AS
COMMITTEE MEMBERS TO REFLECT
THE FOR AND ENGAGING IN THE
LAND ON THE LAND-USE COMMITTEE.
BECAUSE THIS IS A LAND-USE
MANY, THIS IS WHY WE REFLECT
ABOUT HISTORY, OF THE LAND THAT
WE STAND ON.
SO WE BEGIN THE MEETING BY
ACKNOWLEDGING WE ARE ON THE
TRADITIONAL AND ANCESTRAL END
OF THE FIRST PEOPLE OF THIS
REGION, PAST AND PRESENT.
REPRESENTED IN A NUMBER OF
TRIBES AND AS URBAN NATIVES.
IN HONOR WITH GRATITUDE, THE
LAND ITSELF AND PEOPLE OF THIS
LAND.
WE START WITH THIS
ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO RECOGNIZE THE
FACT THAT WE ARE GUESTS ON THIS
LAND AND WE MUST DUARD OUR LAND
AS SUCH AS GUESTS.
IT IS NOT A CHECKLIST AND DOES
NOT GIVE A PASSPORT TO PROCEED
HOWEVER WE DESIRE.
IT IS A REMINDER THAT WE MUST
DUARD OUR WORK AS GUESTS, AS
OUR TIME HERE IS SHORT.
THANK YOU COLLEAGUES.
FOR TODAY'S AGENDA WE HAVE ONE
ITEM, CF 314367.
APPLICATION OF 14302
DEVELOPMENT, LLC, AND THE
SEATTLE HOUSING AUTHORITY, TO
REZONE PORTIONS OF THE LOT
LOCATED AT 14302 30th AVENUE NE
AND PORTIONS OF THE LOT LOCATED
AT 14330 30th AVENUE NE FROM
SINGLE FAMILY 7200, SF 7200, TO
LOWRISE 3, LR3, MULTIFAMILY
RESIDENTIAL, PROJECT NO.
3023581, TYPE IV..
AND THE NEXT MEETING, IT IS ONE
WEEK FROM TODAY ON MONDAY,
NOVEMBER 1st, STARTING AT 10:30
A.M.
OR AFTER COUNCIL BRIEFING,
DEVOTE ON THE ITEM BEFORE US
TODAY.
I HAVE A PRACTICE OF HAVING THE
ITEMS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE
TWICE BEFORE VOTING THEM OUT.
FOR WE BEGIN IF THERE IS NO
OBJECTION THE AGENDA WILL BE
ADOPTED.
HEARING NO OBJECTION, AGENDA IS
ADOPTED.
HERE WE WILL OPEN THE -- FOR
ITEMS ON AGENDA.
I ASK THAT EVERYONE PLEASE BE
PATIENT, WE WANT TO OPERATE THE
NEW SYSTEM IN REAL-TIME.
AS A REMINDER TO THE TWO PEOPLE
SIGNED UP FOR PUBLIC COMMENT,
PUBLIC COMMENT IS LIMITED TO
ITEMS ON TODAY'S AGENDA.
THAT IS THE PAST PRACTICE OF
THIS COMMITTEE.
AND BECAUSE WE HAVE ONLY ONE
AGENDA ITEM ON TODAY'S AGENDA,
AND IT IS A I JUDICIAL MANOR,
COUNCIL RULE PROHIBITS PUBLIC
COMMENT.
SO AS WE ARE OPENING PUBLIC
COUNCIL COMMENT, WE WILL
IMMEDIATELY CLOSE IT.
PUBLIC COUNCIL, IT HAS BEEN
CANCELED FOR TODAY.
THE PUBLIC COMMENT SCRIPT, WHILE
IT REMAINS THE STRONG INTENT
HAVE PUBLIC COMMENT REGULARLY
INCLUDED ON AGENDAS, THE CITY
-- IF WE DEEM THE SYSTEM IS
ABUSED OR UNSUITABLE FOR US TO
CONDUCT NECESSARY BUSINESS.
WILL MODERATE PUBLIC COMMENT
THE FOLLOWING MATTER, UP TO 10
MINUTES WITH TWO MINUTES TO
SPEAK.
EACH SPEAKER WILL BE CALLED BY
NAME IN THE ORDER OF WHICH THEY
REGISTERED ON THE COUNCIL
WEBSITE.
IF YOU HAVE NOT YET REGISTERED
TO SPEAK BUT WOULD LIKE TO YOU
CAN SIGN UP BY GOING TO THE
COUNCIL WEBSITE.
THE LINK IS LISTED ON TODAY'S
AGENDA.
ONCE I CALL IN THE SPEAKERS
NAME THE STAFF WILL IMMEDIATELY
THE MICROPHONE AND PROMPT THAT
IS YOUR TURN TO SPEAK.
PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND THE
AGENDA ITEM IN WHICH YOU ARE
ADDRESSING.
SPEAKERS WILL HELP THE TIME
WHEN 10 SECONDS ARE LEFT OF THE
ALLOTTED TIME.
ONCE THE SPEAKER HEARS THE
CHIME WE ASK THAT YOU BEGIN TO
WRAP A PUBLIC COMMENTS.
IF SPEAKERS DO NOT END THE
PUBLIC COMMENT BY THE END OF
ALLOTTED TIME PROVIDED, THE
MICROPHONE WILL BE MUTED AFTER
10 SECONDS, AND ALLOW US TO
CALL IN THE NEXT WEEK OR.
ONCE YOU HAVE COMPLETED YOUR
COMMENT WE ASK YOU DISCONNECT
FROM THE LINE.
IF YOU PLAN TO CONTINUE TO
FOLLOW THE MEETING PLEASE DO SO
VIA THE SEATTLE CHANNEL OR
LISTED OPTIONS ON THE AGENDA.
AGAIN BECAUSE LAND USE AND
NEIGHBORHOODS COMMITTEE ONLY
ALLOWS PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEMS
ON THE AGENDA, AND THE ONLY
ITEM ON TODAY'S AGENDA IS QUASI-
JUDICIAL, WHICH DOES NOT ALLOW
FOR PUBLIC COMMENT, I WILL MOVE
TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC COMMENT.
AND IF THERE IS NO OBJECTION,
THE PUBLIC COMMENT WILL BE
CLOSED.
HEARING NO OBJECTION.
PUBLIC COMMENT IS NOW CLOSED.
OUR ONLY ITEM OF BUSINESS ON
TODAY'S AGENDA IS CF 314367,
WE PLEASE READ THE ABBREVIATED
TITLE INTO THE RECORD?
>> ITEM CF 314367, APPLICATION
OF 14302 DEVELOPMENT, LLC, AND
THE SEATTLE HOUSING AUTHORITY,
TO REZONE PORTIONS OF THE LOT
LOCATED AT 14302 30th AVENUE NE
AND PORTIONS OF THE LOT LOCATED
AT 14330 30th AVENUE NE FROM
SINGLE FAMILY 7200, SF 7200, TO
LOWRISE 3, LR3, MULTIFAMILY
RESIDENTIAL, PROJECT NO.
3023581, TYPE IV. .
>> THANK YOU.
AND MR. LISH WHITSON, WOULD YOU
LIKE TO, WE ARE JOINED BY LISH
WHITSON OF COUNCIL CENTER
STAFF.
CAN YOU PLEASE PROVIDE THE
RULES AND PROCESSES FOR
CONSIDERING QUASI-JUDICIAL
REZONE.
>> UNDER STATE LAW, THE
COUNCIL'S ACTION NEEDS TO BE
BASED ON A RECORD THAT IS
COMPILED BY THE CITY HEARING
EXAMINER.
SO THE PROCESS GENERALLY IS THAT
SOMEONE SEEKING THE REZONE FOR
A PARTICULAR PIECE OF PROPERTY
OR IN THIS CASE, TWO ADJACENT
PIECES OF PROPERTY, FILES AND
APPLICATIONS WITH THE
DEPARTMENT OF CONSTRUCTION
INSPECTIONS.
AS DCI, THEY REVIEWED THE
APPLICATION, AND THE RECORD,
AND COMPILES THE RECORD.
THE DIRECTOR OF SDCI MAKES THE
RECOMMENDATION TO THE HEARING
EXAMINER AND THE HEARING
EXAMINER HOLDS A RECORD PUBLIC
HEARING.
COMPILES A RECORD OF THE
DECISION, IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS
FOR THE REZONE.
AND FORWARDS RECOMMENDATION TO
THE CITY COUNCIL.
IN THIS CASE, THE
RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE
THE REZONE WITH CONDITIONS.
THE COUNCIL'S DECISION ON THE
REZONE LIKE THIS, WHERE IT IS
AN INDIVIDUAL PARTY, NEEDS TO
BE BASED ON THE RECORD THAT IS
COMPILED BY THE HEARING
EXAMINER, AND CANNOT CONSIDER
ANYTHING OUTSIDE OF THAT
RECORD.
SO TODAY I WILL BE WALKING
THROUGH SOME KEY POINTS OF THE
RECORD, AND THEN ANSWERING ANY
QUESTIONS TO THE BEST OF MY
ABILITY.
LET ME SHARE A PRESENTATION.
>> MR. LISH WHITSON, CAN YOU
EXPAND A LITTLE BIT ON THE
PROCESS AND RULES, WHEN YOU SAY
WE ARE NOT ALLOWED TO HAVE EX
PARTE COMMUNICATION, WE MUST
ONLY CONSIDER INFORMATION ON
THE RECORD, CAN YOU CONFIRM
THAT THIS MEANS WE ARE NOT TO
BE SPEAKING WITH ANY OPPONENTS
OR PROPONENTS OF THE LEGISLATION
, ALL OF THE INFORMATION WE
MUST RECEIVE AT THIS TIME IS
FROM YOU AND NO ONE ELSE.
IS THAT A LAYPERSON'S
UNDERSTANDING?
>> THAT IS CORRECT, YES.
>> THANK YOU.
>> SO THIS IS A PROPOSAL FOR A
REASON, AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER
OF 143rd STREET, AND 30th
AVENUE NORTHEAST.
IT COVERS TWO PORTIONS OF TWO
SPLIT SEWN PARCELS ON THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF THAT
INTERSECTION.
THE SITE IS TWO BLOCKS WEST OF
LAKE CITY WAY AND ONE BLOCK
SOUTH OF THE CITY BORDER.
THE BLACK DASHED LINE SHOWS THE
PORTIONS OF THE PARCELS TO BE
REZONED.
THE PRIMARY APPLICANT IS THE
OWNER OF THE PROPERTY AT THE
CORNER OF THE 143rd AND 30th.
14302 LLC.
THE PROPERTY OWNER TO THE NORTH
IS THE SEATTLE HOUSING
AUTHORITY, THEY HAVE SURFACE
PARKING LOT THAT IS ZONED
SINGLE-FAMILY 7200, AS IS THE
PORTION, THE PROPERTY OWNER'S
SITE THAT IS PROPOSED TO BE
REZONED.
SO, TWO PORTIONS OF THE BLOCK
ARE CURRENTLY ZONED SINGLE-
FAMILY, 7200.
THE PROPOSAL IS TO REZONE BOTH
OF THOSE, THEY ARE BOTH
PORTIONS OF SPLIT SEWN LOTS AND
THE REST OF THE LOTS ARE ZONED
LOWRISE THREE, WITH MANDATORY
HOUSING AND AFFORDABILITY
SUFFIX.
ANY QUESTIONS ON THE LOCATION
AND SITE WE ARE TALKING ABOUT?
GREAT.
SO THIS IS ZOOMING IN, SURFACE
PARKING LOT ON THE NORTH SIDE
SERVES SEATTLE HOUSING
AUTHORITY PROPERTY, AND
APARTMENT COMPLEX, AND THE MAIN
PROPERTY IS PROPOSED TO BE,
CURRENTLY VACANT AND PROPOSED
TO BE REDEVELOPED WITH 12
TOWNHOMES IN FOUR STRUCTURES.
THE EASTERN PORTION OF THAT
PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED
LOWRISE 3, AND IS A CORRIDOR.
IT IS AN ENVIRONMENTALLY
CRITICAL AREA, NO DEVELOPMENT
IS PROPOSED ON THAT PORTION OF
THE SITE BECAUSE IT IS A --
CORRIDOR.
YOU CAN SEE ON THIS SLI THAT
THE SITE SLOPES TO THE EAST,
DOWN INTO WHAT IS A GOALIE OR
DITCH, THAT IS CURRENTLY AN
OPEN WATERWAY ON THE EAST SIDE
OF THE SITE.
THE REMAINING MOST OF THE BLOCK
IS STILL LOWRISE 3, WITH
MIDRISE ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE
BLOCK.
THE SITE IS WELL SERVED BY
TRANSIT, THERE IS A BUS STOP
FOR THE 65 BUS, ADJACENT TO THE
PROPERTY.
30th AVENUE NORTHEAST IN THIS
AREA IS A, AND ONTARIO, -- AN
ARTERIAL, AND THERE ARE NUMBER
OF ROUTES ON LAKE CITY WAY AS
WELL.
SO THIS IS THE PROPOSED
DEVELOPMENT THAT THE REZONE
WOULD FACILITATE.
12 TOWN HOUSES, AND
PRESERVATION AND RESTORATION OF
THE REPAIRING THE CORRIDOR.
THE 12th PARKING SPACES ARE
PROPOSED TO SERVE THE 12
TOWNHOUSES.
IN REVIEWING THE REZONE
PROPOSAL, THE HEARING EXAMINER
AND SBC I LAID OUT IN THE
MUNICIPAL LAND USE CODE, CHAPTER
, SORRY, THAT SHOULD BE 34 IN
THE TITLE.
AMONG THE KEY CRITERIA, THAT
THE HEARING EXAMINER
HIGHLIGHTED, WERE THE SITE IN
EXISTENT TO SUPPORT ZONE 2,
LOWRISE 3, WITH A MULTIFAMILY
AREA, YOUR COMMERCIAL ZONES
ALONG LAKE CITY WAY, WELL
SERVED BY PUBLIC TRANSIT.
WITH DIRECT ARTERIAL ACCESS AND
PARKS AND REC SERVICES.
AND THIS IS AN IMAGE OF THE
SITE.
AND THAT IS ALL I HAVE, IT IS A
FAIRLY STRAIGHTFORWARD REQUEST.
AND I AM HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY
QUESTIONS.
>> GOOD, THANK YOU LISH
WHITSON.
I HAVE A FEW QUESTIONS, I WILL
ASK ONE AND THEN PASS IT TO MY
COLLEAGUES.
I UNDERSTAND THERE ARE
EXCEPTIONAL TREES PROPOSED TO
BE REMOVED IN THE SITE.
CAN YOU ELABORATE WHICH TREES
ARE BEING REMOVED, REASONS FOR
REMOVAL AND WHAT THE REPLACEMENT
PROCEDURE IS AT THIS TIME.
>> YES, THANK YOU.
SO ON THIS SITE, THE RED
NUMBERS ARE EXCEPTIONAL TREES
ON THE SITE AND THERE ARE FIVE
THAT WERE IDENTIFIED BY
ARBORISTS, FOR THE DEVELOPER.
TWO ARE PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED,
THEY ARE SHOWN WITH AN X. THE
ARBORIST FOUND THEY WERE HIGH
RISK.
AND RECOMMENDED REMOVAL.
THEY ARE BOTH WESTERN RED CEDAR,
THE DEVELOPMENT INCLUDES
PLANTING THREE NEW WESTERN RED
CEDAR'S ALONG THE EASTERN EDGE
OF THE PROPERTY, OF THE
DEVELOPMENT.
AND ALSO A NUMBER OF ADDITIONAL
TREES WILL BE PLANTED WITHIN THE
-- IS PART OF THE RESTORATION
IN THAT AREA.
THE PROJECT WILL INVOLVE
TEARING OUT INVASIVE SPECIES
THAT ARE CURRENTLY IN THERE AND
REPLANTING WITH NATIVE PLANTS.
>> THANK YOU.
AND CAN YOU CONFIRM FOR ME, FOR
ANY OTHER CIRCUMSTANCE.
>> ON THIS IMAGE HE MAY NOT BE
ABLE TO SEE IT.
IT SAYS NO DEVELOPMENT ALLOWED
IN THE WHITE SECTION OF THE LOT.
THERE ARE LIMITS IN THE
DEVELOPMENT.
AND IN THE AREA, THE BUFFER
ZONE.
SO DEVELOPMENT, ON THE SITE, IT
IS PRIMARY IMITATED TO I GUESS
THAT SALMON COLOR, THAT AREA ON
THE SITE.
ON THE WESTERN PORTION OF THE
LOT.
THE DEVELOPMENT IN THE BUFFER
AREA, BUT MITIGATION IS
REQUIRED FOR DEVELOPMENT, IN
THAT AREA.
>> THAT IS HELPFUL.
MAY I PROVIDE A SUMMARY OF WHAT
I HEARD YOU SAY AND LET ME KNOW
IF THAT IS CORRECT OR NOT.
WHILE WE ARE LOSING TWO OF THE
FIVE TREES, WE WILL GAIN USE OF
THREE TREES OR FOUR?
>> SO THREE CEDAR, ALONG,
ADJACENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT.
AND THEN A NUMBER OF TREES, I
THINK THERE IS AS MANY AS 21 IN
THE -- CORRIDOR.
>> AND THE THREE RED CEDAR WILL
BE PLANTED IN THE ZONE THAT CAN
NEVER BE DEVELOPED AND HAS THE
SPACE IT NEEDS FOR THE ROOTS TO
GROW STRONG IN THE CANOPY TO
GROW LARGE.
IS THAT CORRECT?
>> SO THE THREE CEDAR ARE BEING
PLANTED IN THE BUFFER AREA, IN
ADDITION THERE ARE 21 CEDAR
THAT ARE BEING PLANTED WITHIN
THE CORRIDOR.
>> OKAY.
GREAT.
>> SO WE WILL HAVE 21 CEDAR IN
THE CORRIDOR THAT CAN NEVER BE
DEVELOPED?
>> YES.
>> OKAY.
I HAVE OTHER QUESTIONS THAT
WANT TO OPEN UP FOR COLLEAGUES
AND COUNCILMEMBER LEWIS
JOINED US AT THE START OF THE
MEETING.
APOLOGIES FOR NOT TO BEGIN
SOONER, COUNCILMEMBER LEWIS
HAS BEEN WITH US THE WHOLE
TIME.
COLLEAGUES, OTHER QUESTIONS?
I AM NOT SEEING ANY.
I WILL CONTINUE.
AND IF FOLKS HAVE QUESTIONS,
PLEASE RAISE YOUR HAND.
LISH, CAN YOU SHARE DETAILS
ABOUT AMENDMENTS WE NEED TO
MAKE TO THIS REZONE, IF WE
DECIDE TO IMPROVE IT.
>> SO THERE ARE A COUPLE OF
THINGS.
SO JUST WALK THROUGH ALL OF THE
DIFFERENT DOCUMENTS THAT YOU
WILL NEED TO ADD ON AS YOU
CONSIDER THIS PROPOSAL.
THE FIRST IS COUNCIL FINDING
CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION.
THAT IS TYPICALLY BASED ON THE
RECOMMENDED FINDINGS CONCLUSION
FROM THE HEARING EXAMINER.
THE COUNCIL'S DECISIONS
INCLUDE A DRAFT, BASED ON THE
HEARING EXAMINER'S RECORDATION.
PLUS, A COUPLE CHANGES THAT I
WILL GET INTO AND JUST A MINUTE
AND TOUCH UPON.
THE RECOMMENDATION THAT CAME TO
COUNCIL, WAS FOR A DESIGNATION
UNDER THE MANDATORY HOUSING
AUTHORITY PROGRAM.
THE M DESIGNATION IS THE LOWEST
DESIGNATION, APPROPRIATE FOR
EXAMPLE, REZONE WITHIN A
CATEGORY.
FOR EXAMPLE, IF IT WAS A REZONE
FROM LOWRISE 1, TO LOWRISE 2,
IT WOULD DEFINITELY GET THE M
DESIGNATION.
THE CODE STATES THAT A REZONE
FROM A SINGLE FAMILY TO LOWRISE
3, SHOULD RECEIVE M 2
DESIGNATION UNDER THE PROGRAM.
THAT IS THE DIFFERENCE OF, IN
THIS AREA, IT WOULD GO FROM
$7.00 A SQUARE FOOT, FOR
AFFORDABLE HOUSING, TO $12.50,
A SQUARE FOOT.
FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING.
TO COMPLY WITH THE MANDATORY
HOUSING AFFORDABILITY PROGRAM
REQUIREMENTS.
OR FOR A CHANGE FROM 6% OF THE
UNITS, 10 9% OF THE UNITS, IF
DEVELOPERS CHOOSE TO, THE
PERFORMANCE OPTION UNDER MHA.
SO I WOULD RECOMMEND THAT YOU
MODIFY THE HEARING EXAMINER'S
RECOMMENDATION, TO CHANGE THE
DESIGNATION FROM M, THE M2,
CONSISTENT WITH THE CODE.
>> THANK YOU.
THAT IS HELPFUL.
CAN YOU REMIND ME WITH
REVIEWING THE DOCUMENTS, WAS
THIS ALREADY ASSUMPTION WITHIN
THE DOCUMENTS WITH IN THE
RECORD.
>> A NUMBER OF THE DOCUMENTS
DID SHOW M TO, BUT THE
RECOMMENDATION THAT CAME TO
COUNCIL, DID NOT INCLUDE THAT
DESIGNATIONS.
THERE WAS AN ERROR SOMEWHERE.
>> OKAY.
AND I NOTICED THAT THERE ARE,
WE DON'T, OF DOCUMENTS WE HAVE
TO APPROVE, WE DO NOT HAVE A
DOCUMENT TO APPROVE
REDEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR THE
SEATTLE HOUSING AUTHORITY SITE,
AT 14303 NORTHEAST, I WANT TO
CONFIRM THAT THIS IS DUE TO THE
FACT THAT THERE ARE NO
REDEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR THE
SEATTLE HOUSING AUTHORITY SITE
AT 14303, IS THIS CORRECT?
OR AM I MISSING THIS?
>> CORRECT, THE DEVELOPMENT, IT
WAS ONLY FOR THE CORNER LOT.
IS PRIVATELY OWNED.
THE HOUSING AUTHORITY WAS
BROUGHT IN PRIMARILY BECAUSE IT
DID NOT MAKE SENSE TO KEEP A
SMALL PORTION OF THE BLOCK AND
SINGLE-FAMILY, SO THERE WAS A
REQUEST THAT THEY BE BROUGHT
INTO THE REZONE AS WELL.
SO, THANK YOU FOR TAKING UP THE
SECOND SET OF AMENDMENTS, TO
THE RECOMMENDATION.
THERE ARE THREE CONDITIONS THAT
THE HEARING EXAMINER RECOMMENDS
APPLYING TO THE SITES.
THE FIRST TWO ARE BOTH RELATED
TO THE MANDATORY HOUSING
AFFORDABILITY ACQUIREMENTS.
THE THIRD IS THE DEVELOPMENT
SHOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH THE
PLANS THAT WERE FILED.
FOR THE REDEVELOPING OF THE
CORNER PROPERTY.
AND I RECOMMEND YOU ONLY HAVE
THAT REQUIRING CONSISTENCY WITH
THE PLANS TO THE CORNER PROPERTY
AND NOT TO THE SEAS -- SEATTLE
HOUSING AUTHORITY.
DO APPLY TO THE AUTHORITY THEY
WILL PROBABLY HAVE TO COME BACK
IF AND WHEN THEY CHOSE TO
PURSUE DEVELOPMENT ON THAT SITE,
FOR AMENDMENT TO WHAT WILL
BECOME A PROPERTY USE AND
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, THAT WE
WILL BE REQUIRED TO FILE, IN
ORDER TO AFFECT THE REZONE.
>> THANK YOU.
ARE THERE ANY OTHER AMENDMENTS
THAT WE NEED TO BE AWARE OF,
ANY POTENTIAL AMENDMENTS?
>> THOSE ARE THE TWO THAT I
FLAGGED FOR YOU.
WE CAN DISCUSS ANY AMENDMENTS
COUNCIL MEMBERS MAY WANT TO
PURSUE.
BUT I DID NOT SEE ANYTHING ELSE
IN THE RECORD THAT WARRANTED
COUNCIL CHANGING THE HEARING
EXAMINER'S RECOMMENDATION.
>> TO BE HAVE THE ABILITY TO
REQUIRE ANY TREE REPLANTING'S?
OR IS IS OUTSIDE THE ZONE?
>> SO ANY AMENDMENTS OR
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENT SHOULD
BE BASED ON THE RECORD.
AND I DID NOT SEE ANYTHING IN
THE RECORD THAT WOULD
NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL NEGATION
OF IMPACTS.
>> OKAY.
THANK YOU.
COLLEAGUES, OTHER QUESTIONS?
I AM NOT SEEING ANY.
PLEASE FEEL FREE TO POP UP, IF
YOU DO.
LISH, MY LAST QUESTION, IF WE
DECIDE TO APPROVE THE REZONE
NEXT WEEK, WHAT ARE THE NEXT
UPS FROM THERE?
>> IN APPROVING THE REZONE YOU
WOULD, IN RECOMMENDING APPROVAL
OF REZONE, YOU WOULD ADD THE
FINDINGS CONCLUSIONS AND
DECISION TO THE CLERK FILE.
AND DIRECT ME TO PREPARE AN
ORDINANCE THAT WOULD EFFECTUATE
THE REZONE.
I WILL WORK WITH THE PROPERTY
OWNERS, TO FILE PROPERTY USE
AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS.
THAT REFLECT THE PROPOSED
CONDITIONS THAT YOU PLACE ON
THE PROPERTY.
AND INTRODUCE A BILL PROBABLY A
WEEK AFTER YOUR VOTE ON THE
REZONE.
AND THAT CAN BE READY FOR A
COUNCIL VOTE A WEEK AFTER THAT.
>> THANK YOU.
SEEING NO OTHER QUESTIONS.
COLLEAGUES, POP UP IF YOU HAVE
THEM.
I WILL THANK YOU MR. WHITSON
AND THIS WILL BE BACK BEFORE
THE THE COMMITTEE ON MONDAY,
NOVEMBER 5th.
-- NOVEMBER 1st.
THIS DOES CONCLUDE THE MONDAY,
OCTOBER 25th, 2021 MEETING.
AS A REMINDER OUR NEXT
COMMITTEE MEETING WILL BE
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 1st, STARTING
AT 10:30 A.M.
OR DIRECTLY AFTER COUNCIL
REAPING.
THANK YOU ALL FOR ATTENDING.
WE ARE ADJOURNED.