|
The nominated Board members, who must undergo full Council confirmation in the coming weeks, include Tina Bueche, a small business owner in Pioneer Square; George Davenport, a lawyer and Chief Operating Officer at First African Methodist Episcopal Church on Capitol Hill; Sharon Dear, a litigation defense lawyer and former deputy prosecuting attorney; Steven Freng, a clinical psychologist specializing in drug prevention and treatment; Martha Nordberg, a CPA and former sworn law enforcement officer; Patrick Sainsbury, designated as chair of the Board who led the fraud division of the King County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office for 26 years; and, David Wilma, a free-lance writer and former sworn law enforcement officer.s, include Tina officer.
"This group brings a diversity of experiences to the Review Board," said Councilmember Tim Burgess, chair of the Public Safety, Human Services and Education Committee. "These individuals have the disposition, skills, and competence to serve every citizen and every neighborhood. The Board is in good hands. Police accountability and oversight is strengthened by these highly qualified individuals."
"Fairness and transparency in the police accountability system are important to the public and to police officers," said incoming Board Chair Patrick Sainsbury. "Police officers have great power and discretion, and it is good public policy that they be accountable for their use of their power and discretion. The City Council members and their staff who interviewed me share these values. I’m honored to be selected to serve and look forward to working with my fellow Board members to make the system work fairly and transparently."
Councilmember Bruce Harrell said, "After personally interviewing the candidates to fill this board, I can say with all certainty that the individuals we have selected are the highest qualified and will do the City proud."
Added Councilmember Nick Licata, "The outgoing board has made a tremendous contribution towards the goal of greater transparency in Seattle’s police accountability practices. The members of the new Board will best benefit from that contribution as they take on this challenging work by striving to listen to as many voices as possible."
The Public Safety, Human Services, and Education Committee will consider the Board nominations on Tuesday, August 5, 2008, at 2:00 pm. Full Council action will likely occur the following Monday, August 11, at 2:00 pm.
Biographies of the nominees to the OPA Review Board
Our Mission: To strengthen the system of police accountability by providing an independent
review of the Office of Professional Accountability (OPA), by making recommendations that address both citizen and law
enforcement officer concerns, and thereby building confidence and credibility in police-community relations in Seattle.
Why was the board created: In response to concerns from various segments of the community,
Seattle City Council passed an ordinance in 1999 creating the Office of Professional Accountability. That office has three
parts: the Director (a civilian who reports to the Chief of Police); the Auditor (an independent contractor, appointed by
the Mayor, who audits all complaints); and the Review Board,
established
in May 2002. The OPA Board is made up of three citizens appointed by City Council.
What the Review Board will do: Our primary task is to oversee the way the OPA handles
citizen complaints against Seattle police officers. We review completed OPA investigations as well as OPA Auditor reports.
We report periodically to City Council and advise Seattle officials on policies and procedures to strengthen the police
accountability system.
What our goals are: Our goals are to build a sense of confidence in the community that
police work is fair, even-handed, and free of bias; and to build a sense of confidence in the police force that complaints
against police officers will be treated fairly and without prejudice. Above all, we are committed to strengthening
communications between police and the community.
How we intend to accomplish these goals: The Board determines the effectiveness of the
OPA complaint process. We will take the pulse of affected stakeholders, including the community, and rank-and-file police
officers, and provide policy recommendations to City Council based on trends, issues, and suggestions for improvement.
|